I've never actually heard anyone say it's not Prodigy sounding, in fact I recall many (including myself) being delighted when first hearing Omen and the like.
But yeah, it's much more a 'standard' album in terms of layout, track length and song arrangement.
It is upbeat, and that's what I wanted to hear after AONO. It was a comeback album for many, and to be as original as it was after almost 2 decades of the band being around is remarkable.
AONO had a lot of forgettable sections and songs, but IMD was like I said, very colourful and original...I don't know how Liam did it.
The live shows, although not attending ANY, was another feat that some overlook. Non-stop touring around the world (India ffs) at the age they're at shouldn't be overlooked. The setlist barely changed which many didn't like, but I think that's irrelevant unless you're planning on attending multiple gigs in a row.
It didn't die down, go sour or end messy, it was a very clean cut era; they came, did their shit hard, and finished, ready for the next. It's so easy to criticise but look at the big things you would be criticising if things were different, things that Liam and co obviously worked hard to achieve;
- Intense touring, despite the fanbase shrinking and being at their age
- Original sound; they didn't go DnB, dubstep or follow any trends
- Paul's youtube footage; they took advantage of the internet and gave us what we couldn't have before
- The live DVD as proxi mentioned
- The special edition IMD with the remixes, worth noting
- The image; a new image for new audience, but still hard and not some clean cut shit
All in all, I'm impressed with how it all turned out, considering how it could have went...
And proxi, don't forget Mescaline